Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 5:08:36 GMT -4
The International Athletics Federation has declared that no transsexual woman will be able to participate in competitions that count towards its international ranking.
Sports such as cycling, swimming or rugby prohibit or restrict access to transgender people . The International Olympic Committee, however, intends to promote inclusion, but controversy is served.
Probably the measure to be established should be the same for all competitions: either a ban, or the creation of a different category , so that discrimination is not caused with the rest of the participants.
What we have ruled out in the field of access to public service (the creation of a quota for trans people, which already exists in some autonomies), would perhaps be the Fax Lists most favorable in the sports field (in terms of the constitution of a different category , and differentiated from the binary sex (woman and man), to avoid inequality.
The debate has also arisen in the application of the trans law in relation to the area of sexist violence. This would be the case in which a man is convicted of gender violence, and attempts to avoid the sentence imposed by changing his sex.
However, this case would be outside the norm, because art. 46.3 establishes that the rectification of the registry mention relating to sex will not alter the legal regime that, prior to the registration of the registry change, was applicable to the person for the purposes of Organic Law 1/2004, of December 28, of Comprehensive Protection Measures against Gender Violence.
Therefore, if he committed violence as a man, he will be convicted of gender violence, even if he had rectified the sex. But what if he changes sex before and then commits sexist violence? In this case, he could be favored by the application of the trans law, and we would also be facing another fraud of law that, in this case, would have to be judged by the Administration of Justice.
Sports such as cycling, swimming or rugby prohibit or restrict access to transgender people . The International Olympic Committee, however, intends to promote inclusion, but controversy is served.
Probably the measure to be established should be the same for all competitions: either a ban, or the creation of a different category , so that discrimination is not caused with the rest of the participants.
What we have ruled out in the field of access to public service (the creation of a quota for trans people, which already exists in some autonomies), would perhaps be the Fax Lists most favorable in the sports field (in terms of the constitution of a different category , and differentiated from the binary sex (woman and man), to avoid inequality.
The debate has also arisen in the application of the trans law in relation to the area of sexist violence. This would be the case in which a man is convicted of gender violence, and attempts to avoid the sentence imposed by changing his sex.
However, this case would be outside the norm, because art. 46.3 establishes that the rectification of the registry mention relating to sex will not alter the legal regime that, prior to the registration of the registry change, was applicable to the person for the purposes of Organic Law 1/2004, of December 28, of Comprehensive Protection Measures against Gender Violence.
Therefore, if he committed violence as a man, he will be convicted of gender violence, even if he had rectified the sex. But what if he changes sex before and then commits sexist violence? In this case, he could be favored by the application of the trans law, and we would also be facing another fraud of law that, in this case, would have to be judged by the Administration of Justice.